How former senior WASAC officials ended up behind bars #rwanda #RwOT

At the centre are Prof. Omar Munyaneza, former Chief Executive Officer of WASAC Group; Umuhumuza Gisèle, Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and former head of WASAC Utility; and Dominique Murekezi, former head of WASAC Development, who were remanded in custody for 30 days, while two other officials were released on provisional bail.

Apart from Prof. Omar Munyaneza, whose arrest had already been reported, the detentions of the others were not widely covered in the media until the case reached court.

The suspects are being prosecuted for a range of offences, including abuse of authority for personal gain; making decisions based on favouritism, friendship, hatred, nepotism, or cronyism; mismanagement of public resources; illicit enrichment; failure to justify assets; and soliciting, accepting, or giving amounts of money beyond what is legally permitted.

Some charges apply to all three officials, while others are specific to each individual. The two charges they all face are abusing authority for personal gain and making decisions based on favouritism, nepotism, and cronyism, particularly regarding the recruitment of 48 employees at WASAC.

When WASAC was restructured into three companies, staff had to be deployed in the two newly created entities, alongside reassignments of existing personnel. Under the leadership of Prof. Munyaneza, WASAC sought to expedite the recruitment process. The Prosecution, however, argues that the process violated the HR policy, as candidates were tested by a panel composed mainly of University of Rwanda lecturers, who were external to WASAC.

It is alleged that each official assisted certain candidates in passing exams and securing jobs. For example, Prof. Munyaneza is accused of favouring Mungwakuzwe Dieudonné, with whom he had previously worked in Parliament.

The Prosecution argues that Prof. Munyaneza himself prepared the exam taken by Mungwakuzwe, and the job advert was tailored to Mungwakuzwe's qualifications.

Mungwakuzwe reportedly passed the exam and was hired, but received a salary far above the amount allocated for the position. Instead of earning Frw 1.2 million plus a lump sum allowance of Frw 297,000, he was allegedly paid over Frw 1.6 million, along with a lump sum of Frw 1.8 million per month. Similar cases of favouritism were reported for other candidates.

In the case of Umuhumuza Gisèle, the Prosecution alleges that she allowed Rasana Ndahiro Eric to sit for an internal auditor's exam despite not meeting requirements such as holding a bachelor's degree (A0) and CCA level 2 or CPA level 2 certification. He passed the exam and was unlawfully hired.

The suspects are also accused of giving jobs to 22 graduates from the University of Rwanda and Ines Ruhengeri, presented as the 'best performers,' although evidence later showed they were not the top candidates. They allegedly promoted employees irregularly, reassigned staff unlawfully, and forced others into early retirement before reaching the legal age.

The Prosecution presented evidence, including written notices from Prof. Munyaneza instructing staff to retire early to 'make space for younger employees,' as well as call records, text messages, and testimony from affected employees.

In his defence, Prof. Munyaneza denied the accusations, saying recruitment and retirements were handled by the HR office, not him personally. He also argued that the hiring of 48 employees, the recruitment of 22 graduates, and staff reassignments were collective decisions made with the heads of WASAC's three entities.

Umuhumuza is further charged with mismanagement of public resources. The Prosecution alleges that between 2021, when she served as Acting CEO of WASAC, and 2023, when Prof. Munyaneza took over, she used a company car while also receiving monthly lump sum allowances intended for personal transport, which is not permitted.

Although the car was fully maintained by WASAC, she allegedly received allowances totalling Frw 97 million. In response, she argued she was never informed of the policy and believed the allowances were legitimate. She said all trips were work-related and the vehicle was assigned to the CEO's office.

Additionally, Umuhumuza, who managed WASAC Utility and oversaw the Group's budget, is accused of authorising irregular salary payments exceeding Frw 20 million to Mungwakuzwe, who was allegedly paid beyond the scale of his position.

As for Dominique Murekezi, head of WASAC Development, he is accused of complicity in abuse of authority for personal gain in relation to the recruitment of the 48 employees. Both he and Umuhumuza argued that Prof. Munyaneza initiated the decision, presenting it as a proposal that was eventually implemented. Murekezi added that his role was limited to oral interviews, which he claimed were conducted properly.

The Nyamirambo Primary Court ruled that the three officials be remanded in custody for 30 days, citing serious grounds for suspicion of the alleged crimes.

Two officials released on bail

The court ordered the provisional release of Dieudonné Mungwakuzwe, who had been accused of unlawfully receiving inflated salary payments. The court ruled that there were no substantial grounds to keep him in detention. It found that he had not appointed himself, merely signed an employment contract, was not responsible for his own payroll, and had legitimately taken and passed the recruitment exam. As a result, the court concluded there was no strong basis to suspect him of the alleged offence. He was provisionally released on September 3, 2025.

Another official released on bail was Mugwaneza Vincent de Paul, Director of Water Supply at WASAC. He was being tried separately and faced charges including sexual exploitation, making decisions based on favouritism, hatred or nepotism, as well as failing to justify assets.

The Prosecution alleged that Mugwaneza exploited female interns at WASAC, promising them jobs in return for sexual favours. Testimonies were presented from five women, anonymised with codes such as MN, RTC, BIF and MG, who claimed they had sexual relations with him and later received his support in job placements. One witness, MN, testified that Mugwaneza deceived her by saying he was single, while he was in fact married, and that they met during her internship at WASAC.

The Prosecution also submitted evidence, including testimony and messages exchanged between Mugwaneza and the women, which were said to be inappropriate for a supervisor and of a sexual nature.

Additionally, he was accused of failing to explain the origin of Frw 25 million found in his possession. During a closed hearing, Mugwaneza explained that the money had been lent to him by a friend, Bikorimana Aimable, to pay an engineer building his house.

The court found there were no strong grounds to continue suspecting him of illicit enrichment, since Bikorimana's testimony supported his explanation and the Prosecution had not provided evidence to the contrary. Moreover, it noted that it was not unusual for an employee earning more than Frw 3 million per month to receive such a loan.

On the charge of sexual exploitation, the court ruled that the evidence was insufficient. Witness statements were contradictory; some admitted he was not their supervisor, while others confirmed they had obtained jobs independently despite their personal relationships with him.

Based on these findings, the court ordered Mugwaneza's provisional release, ruling that there were no strong grounds for continued detention.