The agreement, brokered by the United States, was expected to usher in a new phase of stability. However, observers say the success of this process depends on follow-up dialogue between the Congolese government, the AFC/M23 movement, and the eastern Congolese communities, especially the Tutsi and other groups that the movement says it is protecting. Final talks are expected to take place in Qatar.
But just three days after signing the accord, Kinshasa launched drone strikes on Minembwe, a highland town in South Kivu inhabited by Congolese Tutsi civilians, namely the Banyamulenge, many of whom are the very people the government is expected to engage in negotiations.
On June 30, as the country marked 65 years of independence, a Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2 drone bombed a civilian aircraft delivering humanitarian aid to Minembwe. The attack injured several people, including a traditional leader and an 8-year-old child.
The town has long faced isolation, an economic blockade, and a lack of state protection. Residents continue to survive under harsh conditions with little outside assistance. The drone strike did not target AFC/M23 fighters or their allies such as the Twirwaneho self-defense groups, but struck civilians instead, an incident many analysts describe as an attack on hope rather than a military target.
More troubling is the timeline: a full week before the Washington peace agreement was signed, Africa Intelligence reported that the DRC government had already taken delivery of the drones. This suggests that while Kinshasa was preparing to sign for peace, it was simultaneously preparing for war.
These developments raise fundamental questions about the government's sincerity. How can a state pursue peace while investing in tools of destruction? How can it sit at the negotiating table with the same communities it targets from the air?
Observers say these actions undermine trust and cast doubt on Kinshasa's commitment to a political solution. What was presented as diplomacy increasingly appears to be a performance aimed at the international community, rather than a genuine effort to achieve peace.
This approach, experts argue, does not reflect statesmanship but rather deliberate sabotage of the peace process.
For lasting peace in the Great Lakes region, political will must replace symbolic gestures. The cycle of violence will not end through drone attacks or coercion. The DRC leadership must abandon militarized responses and embrace inclusive dialogue, seeing its own citizens not as enemies, but as essential partners in building peace.
Because, as recent events have made clear, you cannot bomb your way into peace.
Kayitare S.
